Independent user survey · February 2026 · N = 74

The numbers behind
coverage intelligence.

74 active users. $75 per completed survey. Independently collected, unfiltered.

91%
Would be disappointed if they lost access to Qumis
73%
Caught something they would have missed
65%
Contributed to winning or expanding a client relationship
82%
Say colleagues on their team should be using Qumis too
Time & Efficiency

Hours returned to every desk, every week.

Manual policy review is the single biggest time drain in commercial brokerage. The numbers below are from people doing that work daily.

"It's like having a support staff that knows more about insurance than you do, who is willing to answer unlimited questions."

Producer / Agent  ·  16–20 years industry experience

"It saves me tons of time of reading."

Account Executive / Broker  ·  7–10 years experience
65%
Save 1 or more hours per week on policy work
Across 74 active commercial P&C professionals
47%
Save 30+ minutes per policy review or task
19%
Save 3 or more hours per week
68%
Share Qumis outputs with colleagues — outputs circulate beyond the individual
Client Impact

Where it actually matters.

Not productivity metrics. Outcomes in real client work.

73%
Caught something they would have missed

54 of 74 users report Qumis uncovered a coverage gap or exclusion that would have gone undetected through manual review.

"It confirmed what I may have already thought but also reviewed for where I may have missed a coverage issue or potential exclusion. Better than any webinar or continuing ed I've been to."

Claims Professional  ·  20+ years experience
62%
Identified an issue that affected a client outcome

46 users report Qumis surfaced something material enough to change how they handled an active client situation.

"It removes so much manual work and lets me focus on what actually matters in the policy."

Service Team Member  ·  7–10 years experience
65%
Contributed to winning, retaining, or expanding a client

30 of 46 users who engaged with the question tied Qumis directly to a revenue outcome.

"Ctrl+F but with a brain."

Account Executive / Broker  ·  20+ years experience
"It does my job ten times faster than I can." Claims Professional  ·  20+ years industry experience
Product-Market Fit

They don't want to go back.

PMF, retention, and satisfaction in a single view.

Sean Ellis PMF Signal
91%
would be disappointed if they could no longer use Qumis
Very disappointed
43%
Somewhat disappointed
48%
The Sean Ellis PMF benchmark is 40% "Very disappointed."
Qumis scores 43% — above threshold.
82%
Willing to Continue Using Qumis

Rated 4 or 5 out of 5 — not passive, actively choosing to keep it.

4.0/5
Overall Satisfaction

73% rated 4 or 5 stars. NPS of +14 — 41% Promoters vs. 27% Detractors.

+14
Net Promoter Score

Enterprise B2B SaaS benchmark: 0–20 is "good." From 74 independently compensated users.

82%
Say there are colleagues on their team who should be using Qumis — but aren't yet.

35% say "Yes, definitely." 47% say "Maybe." This is how accounts expand organically — individual users pull in peers without a top-down mandate.

See what your team is missing.

73% of our users found something they would have missed. See what that looks like for your book.

Book a Demo Independent survey · 74 active users · February 2026

Survey methodology: 74 active Qumis users across commercial P&C insurance brokerages and agencies, surveyed in February 2026. Respondents were compensated $75 per completed survey to ensure candid, independent feedback. Respondents include account executives, brokers, producers, service team members, and claims professionals with an average of 15+ years of industry experience. All statistics reflect self-reported user experience.